<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>San Diego Employment Law Attorney Blog | California Sexual Harassment Lawyer | Carlsbad Wrongful Termination Law Firm</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com,2009-12-03:/1661</id>
    <updated>2010-09-02T16:25:05Z</updated>
    <subtitle>San Diego Employment Law Blog shares news in sexual harassment, wrongful termination, discrimination, defamation and more CA employment rights issues.</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Enterprise 4.32-en</generator>

<entry>
    <title>Disabled Workers Face Higher Unemployment Rate, Discrimination</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/2010/09/disabled-workers-face-higher-unemployment-rate-discrimination.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com,2010://1661.25101</id>

    <published>2010-09-02T02:17:29Z</published>
    <updated>2010-09-02T16:25:05Z</updated>

    <summary>The Wall Street Journal recently took an in-depth look at a Labor Department study examining the situation of disabled workers in the U.S. The study was the first of its kind for the government. Overall, it found that people with...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Grady &amp; Associates</name>
        <uri>http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/mt-bin/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=1661&amp;id=2161</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Discrimination" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The Wall Street Journal recently took an in-depth look at a Labor Department study examining the situation of disabled workers in the U.S. The study was the first of its kind for the government. Overall, it found that people with disabilities were more likely than people without disabilities to be unemployed, older than 65, or working part-time. Disabled workers are more likely to be working for the government or be self-employed.</p>
<p>The Labor Department counted 27 million Americans 16 years or older living with a disability last year. The unemployment rate for disabled workers last year was 14.5 percent, compared with a 9 percent unemployment rate for the overall workforce. As of this July, the unemployment rate for people with disabilities had risen to 16.4 percent.</p>
<p>One obstacle facing workers with disabilities is <a href="http://www.lawgrady.com/CustomPage.shtml">discrimination</a> by potential employers.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>The Wall Street Journal highlighted a couple of cases where job seekers were turned down before they even had an interview because employers did not want to provide accommodations in an interview. The Americans With Disabilities Act prohibits employers and potential employers from discriminating on the basis of disability, but it still happens.</p>
<p>Kathy Martinez, who is blind, is employed by the Obama administration as the assistant secretary for the Labor Department's office of disability employment policy. Martinez says that some employers have misconceptions around what it might mean for their business to employ someone with a disability. Martinez believes the biggest challenge is to change the attitudes or alleviate the fear of these employers hesitant to employ people with disabilities.</p>
<p>Source:</p>
<ul>
<li><a style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704540904575451751896763276.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">Disabled Face Sharply Higher Jobless Rate</a>&nbsp;(The Wall Street Journal)</a></li></ul>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Muslim Employee Files Discrimination Complaint Against Disney</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/2010/08/muslim-employee-files-discrimination-complaint-against-disney.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com,2010://1661.23534</id>

    <published>2010-08-24T16:09:02Z</published>
    <updated>2010-08-24T21:38:22Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[A Muslim&nbsp;woman who&nbsp;works as a hostess in Disneyland has filed a discrimination complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) against Disney because she has been told she cannot wear her hijab while working. Imane Boudlal works as a hostess...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Grady &amp; Associates</name>
        <uri>http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/mt-bin/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=1661&amp;id=2161</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Discrimination" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="disney" label="Disney" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="disneyland" label="Disneyland" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="eeoc" label="EEOC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="muslimemployee" label="Muslim employee" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="discrimination" label="discrimination" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="religiousaccommodation" label="religious accommodation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>A Muslim&nbsp;woman who&nbsp;works as a hostess in Disneyland has filed a <a href="http://www.lawgrady.com/CustomPage.shtml">discrimination complaint</a> with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) against Disney because she has been told she cannot wear her hijab while working. Imane Boudlal works as a hostess at the Storyteller's Restaurant in Disneyland's Grand California Hotel.&nbsp;She was sent home by her employer seven times without pay for wearing her white headscarf against her employer's policy. </p>
<p>According to KTLA.com, Boudlal, 26, became a U.S. citizen last June after&nbsp;emigrating from Morocco five years ago. Boudlal has worked for Disneyland for two years, but only decided to challenge Disney's strict dress code after earning her citizenship. She said the U.S. Constitution grants religious freedom and that is what she is asking for. She asked for religious accommodation to wear the scarf&nbsp;two months ago.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Disney says that they have tried to compromise, offering Boudlal a position in the back of the restaurant and away from interaction with customers. They say they have strict clothing rules because employees who work with customers are basically "on stage" and in costume. They also gave her a hat to wear on top of a bonnet, as a replacement for the headscarf while working.</p>
<p>Boudlal said that she found the hat offensive and believed it made a joke out of her religion and called more attention to her. She believes that wearing the hijab does not hurt Disney or customers, so she does not understand why she cannot wear it.</p>
<p>Source:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ktla.com/news/landing/ktla-disney-discrimination,0,5536535.story">Muslim Hostess Calls Disney's Replacement Hijab 'Offensive'</a> (KTLA.com)</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>FedEx Drivers Sue Employer Over Independent Contractor Status</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/2010/08/fedex-drivers-sue-employer-over-independent-contractor-status.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com,2010://1661.23431</id>

    <published>2010-08-23T18:43:22Z</published>
    <updated>2010-08-23T20:15:23Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[A new lawsuit has been filed against FedEx as part of an ongoing dispute between the company and some of its truck drivers.&nbsp;Thirty-one current and former truck drivers for FedEx&nbsp;filed a lawsuit against&nbsp;the company&nbsp;in a U.S. District Court in Boston...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Grady &amp; Associates</name>
        <uri>http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/mt-bin/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=1661&amp;id=2161</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Employee Rights" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="fedex" label="FedEx" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="employeeemployerrelationship" label="employee-employer relationship" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="independentcontractors" label="independent contractors" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>A new lawsuit has been filed against FedEx as part of an ongoing dispute between the company and some of its truck drivers.&nbsp;Thirty-one current and former truck drivers for FedEx&nbsp;filed a lawsuit against&nbsp;the company&nbsp;in a U.S. District Court in Boston last Tuesday. The lawsuit seeks class-action status and&nbsp;claims that the truck drivers are incorrectly classified as <a href="http://www.lawgrady.com/CustomPage.shtml">independent contractors</a> when they really should be considered employees.</p>
<p>The truck drivers filing the lawsuit claim that they are considered independent contractors even though an employer-employee relationship exists between truck drivers and FedEx. FedEx controls what its drivers wear, sets the times they work, and monitors their performance and equipment, among other things. The drivers are seeking to be classified as&nbsp;employees so that they can <a href="http://www.lawgrady.com/CustomPage.shtml">become unionized</a> as are their counterparts at rival parcel delivery company, UPS. The worker lawsuit is also seeking financial compensation.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>As reported by Reuters, FedEx&nbsp;classifies its truck drivers as independent contractors in order to have a competitive advantage&nbsp;over&nbsp;UPS.&nbsp;Courts&nbsp;have already decided in favor of FedEx's position in similar lawsuits&nbsp;brought against the company.&nbsp;Earlier in August, a district court judge in Indiana ruled&nbsp;against&nbsp;FedEx drivers in another class-action lawsuit. The judge said that even though FedEx had some control over the&nbsp;work and appearance of its drivers, it was not enough to prove the existence of an employer-employee relationship.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Source:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN1715781720100818">UPDATE 2-Drivers sue FedEx over contractor status</a> (Reuters)</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Fresno Hospital Accused of Discriminating Against Filipino Employees</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/2010/08/fresno-hospital-accused-of-discrimating-against-filipino-employees.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com,2010://1661.23101</id>

    <published>2010-08-20T17:24:22Z</published>
    <updated>2010-08-20T18:06:24Z</updated>

    <summary>The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed a lawsuit Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Fresno that claims Delano Regional Medical Center discriminated against Filipino employees. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of more than 30 Filipino employees of the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Grady &amp; Associates</name>
        <uri>http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/mt-bin/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=1661&amp;id=2161</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Discrimination" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="delanoregionalmedicalcenter" label="Delano Regional Medical Center" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="eeoc" label="EEOC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="filipinoemployees" label="Filipino employees" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="discrimination" label="discrimination" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="nationalorigin" label="national origin" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="nonenglishlanguages" label="non-English languages" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed a lawsuit Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Fresno that claims Delano Regional Medical Center <a href="http://www.lawgrady.com/CustomPage.shtml">discriminated</a> against Filipino employees. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of more than 30 Filipino employees of the hospital who say that they were harassed and discriminated against because of their national origin.</p>
<p>The Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination on the basis of national origin. The EEOC claims that Delano Regional Medical Center singled out the employees of Filipino origin and treated them differently by not allowing them to speak Tagalog, while allowing other ethnic groups to speak other non-English languages.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>According to the Bakersfield Californian, Delano Regional Medical Center's chief nursing officer said that she did not witness discrimination against the Filipino employees. She said that it was hospital policy for employees&nbsp;to only speak English in patient areas, unless the patient also spoke the other language and it was being used to communicate more effectively with the patient. She said that employees could speak to each other in other languages in break rooms and areas not within patient care.</p>
<p>The EEOC claims that the Filipino workers were subjected to humiliation, intimidation, heightened security and threats of surveillance, and taunting and hostile remarks from co-workers and supervisors. The lawsuit seeks to stop future discrimination and for the hospital to revise policies and practices. It also seeks financial compensation for the employees.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Source:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bakersfield.com/news/business/economy/x464578132/Delano-Regional-accused-of-discrimination">Delano Regional accused of discrimination</a>&nbsp;(The Bakersfield Californian)</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Debate Continues Around ADA Following Its 20th Anniversary</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/2010/08/debate-continues-around-ada-following-its-20th-anniversary.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com,2010://1661.22613</id>

    <published>2010-08-18T19:47:53Z</published>
    <updated>2010-08-18T22:02:42Z</updated>

    <summary>The 20th anniversary of the passage of the Americans With Disabilities Act, a law that prohibits discrimination in the workplace against those with disabilties, sparked a vocal debate over how effective the law has been in opening up the workplace...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Grady &amp; Associates</name>
        <uri>http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/mt-bin/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=1661&amp;id=2161</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Discrimination" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Employee Rights" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="ada" label="ADA" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="disabledjobseekers" label="disabled job seekers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="disabledworkers" label="disabled workers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="discrimination" label="discrimination" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The 20th anniversary of the passage of the Americans With Disabilities Act, a law that prohibits <a href="http://www.lawgrady.com/CustomPage.shtml">discrimination</a> in the workplace against those with disabilties, sparked a vocal debate over how effective the law has been in opening up the workplace to people with disabilities. A recent article in Newsweek breaks down the debate that's been going on between political commentators and advocates for people with disabilities. </p>
<p>The article begins by saying that the ADA has been "near-universally admired"&nbsp;and has&nbsp;long enjoyed bipartisan support. Some politicians and disability advocate groups have questioned, however, whether the law has really helped people with disabilities. Some point to the statistic that the percentage of unemployment among people with disabilities has remained stable since the passage of the law -- at 60 percent. Each side expresses a different take on the statistic. </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Libertarian politicians and others&nbsp;skeptical of&nbsp;a heavy-handed government presence in the workplace argue that the ADA may actually hurt people with disabilities by actually discouraging employers from hiring people with disabilities&nbsp;out of fear of lawsuits lest they fail to adequately accomodate their new employees. </p>
<p>People&nbsp;who advocate for&nbsp;the civil rights of people with disabilities&nbsp;unanimously agree that the ADA&nbsp;has&nbsp;only been a good thing, but have different opinions of where it should go from here.&nbsp;Likely all&nbsp;agree that the ADA opened up society more for people with disabilities, offered more indepence and self-sufficiency, and raised the standard of expectations. They&nbsp;say there are numerous reasons why a person with a disability may not be working. Most advocates agree, however, that there is a long way to go,&nbsp;first and&nbsp;foremost&nbsp;to completely&nbsp;dispel the notion that a person with a disability has nothing gainful to contribute to society.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Source:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newsweek.com/2010/08/05/did-the-americans-with-disabilities-act-hurt-some-people-with-disabilities.html">Did the Americans With Disabilities Act Hurt Some People With Disabilities?</a>&nbsp;(Newsweek)</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>David Boreanaz Sued by &apos;Bones&apos; Extra for Sexual Harassment</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/2010/08/david-boreanaz-sued-by-bones-extra-for-sexual-harassment.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com,2010://1661.21696</id>

    <published>2010-08-12T17:00:43Z</published>
    <updated>2010-08-12T17:53:04Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[A woman who was employed as an extra on the popular TV show, "Bones," filed a sexual harassment lawsuit against David Boreanaz late last month. Boreanaz both stars on the show&nbsp;and is an&nbsp;executive producer.&nbsp;20th Century Fox Television is also named...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Grady &amp; Associates</name>
        <uri>http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/mt-bin/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=1661&amp;id=2161</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="sexual harassment" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="bones" label="Bones" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="davidboreanaz" label="David Boreanaz" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="sexualharassment" label="sexual harassment" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>A woman who was employed as an extra on the popular TV show, "Bones," filed a <a href="http://www.lawgrady.com/CustomPage.shtml">sexual harassment</a> lawsuit against David Boreanaz late last month. Boreanaz both stars on the show&nbsp;and is an&nbsp;executive producer.&nbsp;20th Century Fox Television is also named as a defendant in the suit, as are various other&nbsp;production companies involved in the&nbsp;show.&nbsp;Kristina Hagan filed the lawsuit&nbsp;in Los Angeles County Superior&nbsp;Court.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Hagan's attorney, Gloria Allred, says she is also representing another woman with a similar&nbsp;charge against Boreanaz of sexual harassment in employment. Allred describes Hagan as&nbsp;a struggling actress who is working hard but not having much luck in the Hollywood entertainment business, which makes her, and actresses like her,&nbsp;vulnerable to&nbsp;people in positions of power. </p>
<p>Representatives&nbsp;for Boreanaz have claimed the allegations are&nbsp;false and "absurd" fabrications.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Hagan was working as an extra in an episode of "Bones"&nbsp;in August&nbsp;2009 when the alleged sexual harassment occurred.&nbsp;In the lawsuit, Hagan&nbsp;accuses Boreanaz&nbsp;of using his position on the show and his 'star power' to exploit her vulnerability&nbsp;in order to gain sexual favors. The lawsuit claims that Boreanaz made unwanted sexual advances toward Hagan while&nbsp;offering&nbsp;to help Hagan with her career.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<p>The lawsuit says that Hagan tried her best to deter the sexual advances without offending Boreanaz because he had offered to help her with her career. The lawsuit cites instances of Boreanaz trying to grope or kiss Hagan as well as instances&nbsp;of Boreanaz allegedly sending sexually explicit and graphic text messages, including one that had a photo attached&nbsp;of Boreanaz's genitals. </p>
<p>Hagan's lawsuit claims that she suffered emotional and psychological distress as a result of the harassment as well as&nbsp;wage losses and loss of benefits.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Source:</p>
<p><a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2010/SHOWBIZ/celebrity.news.gossip/07/22/bones.sex.lawsuit/#fbid=1Efh_8qqZmu&amp;wom=false">'Bones' extra sues David Boreanaz for sex harassment</a>&nbsp;(CNN)</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Age Discrimination: Know Your Rights in the Workplace</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/2010/08/age-discrimination-know-your-rights-in-the-workplace.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com,2010://1661.21055</id>

    <published>2010-08-11T02:03:54Z</published>
    <updated>2010-08-11T19:39:44Z</updated>

    <summary>In the previous post, we wrote about the age discrimination lawsuit against Google Inc. Recently the Supreme Court of California ruled that the case against Google could move forward. Many experts in the employment law field have been calling the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Grady &amp; Associates</name>
        <uri>http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/mt-bin/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=1661&amp;id=2161</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Discrimination" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Employee Rights" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="eeoc" label="EEOC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="usequalemploymentopportunitycommission" label="U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="agediscrimination" label="age discrimination" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>In the previous post, we wrote about the <a href="http://www.lawgrady.com/CustomPage.shtml">age discrimination</a> lawsuit against Google Inc. Recently the Supreme Court of California ruled that the case against Google could move forward. Many experts in the employment law field have been calling the ruling a win for employees, saying that it may be easier, for example, for an employee to get their case heard before a jury.</p>
<p>In light of this recent ruling, we thought it would be pertinent to take a deeper look at the law prohibiting age discrimination in the workplace. The website of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission&nbsp;offers useful facts about age discrimination. Whether you are an employee or an employer, it is always a good time to review The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA).</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>The ADEA protects individuals who are 40 years of age or older from employment discrimination based on age and applies to both employees and job applicants. It is unlawful to discriminate against a person because of their age regarding any term, condition, or privilege of employment, including hiring, firing, promotion, layoff, compensation, benefits, job assignments, and training. </p>
<p>The ADEA applies to apprenticeship programs, job notices and advertisements, pre-employment inquiries, benefits, and to waivers of ADEA rights. If an individual opposes employment practices that discriminate based on age, it is unlawful to retaliate against them. </p>
<p>You can visit the <a href="http://www.eeoc.gov/facts/age.html">EEOC website</a> for a detailed description of the ADEA and other employment laws.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>CA Gov Vetoes Bill For Farmworker Overtime Pay</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/2010/08/ca-gov-vetoes-bill-for-farmworker-overtime-pay.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com,2010://1661.20645</id>

    <published>2010-08-06T20:18:10Z</published>
    <updated>2010-08-06T20:43:28Z</updated>

    <summary>Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger recently vetoed a bill that would have extended the 8-hour workday and overtime pay to workers on farms. Schwarzenegger said that he vetoed the bill because it was impractical to impose the 8-hour workday in the agriculture...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Grady &amp; Associates</name>
        <uri>http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/mt-bin/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=1661&amp;id=2161</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Employee Rights" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="8hourworkday" label="8-hour workday" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="agriculturebusiness" label="agriculture business" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="farmworkers" label="farmworkers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="overtimepay" label="overtime pay" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger recently vetoed a bill that would have extended the 8-hour workday and <a href="http://www.lawgrady.com/CustomPage.shtml">overtime pay</a> to workers on farms. Schwarzenegger said that he vetoed the bill because it was impractical to impose the 8-hour workday in the agriculture business because "it is seasonal, subject to unpredictability of Mother Nature and requires the harvesting of perishable goods." </p>
<p>The sponsor of the bill, Senate Majority Leader Dean Florez (D-Shafter) said that the governor's veto amounts to special treatment for&nbsp;giant agribusiness and&nbsp;"second-class treatment" of workers on farms. Florez aims to reverse the 1941 California law that exempts farm employees from being paid overtime, or 1 1/2 times the normal rate,&nbsp;for any hours worked beyond an 8-hour day. </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>According to an article in the Los Angeles Times, California is the only state that offers any overtime pay for agricultural employees. In 1976, the 1941 statute was modified to provide overtime for time worked beyond 10 hours. In addition, state regulators said that overtime would be provided for all work on the seventh day of a week after putting in six days in a row of 10 hours or more. </p>
<p>Both small organic growers and large agribusinesses spoke out against the passage of the bill, saying that it would be&nbsp;burdensome to their businesses and could actually hurt both consumers and agricultural employees. Those working for farmworkers' rights say that they will continue to fight for an 8-hour day in order to make the job safer and because they say it is only right to provide the same compensation for those harvesting crops as those selling or shipping the crops.</p>
<p>Source:</p>
<p><a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2010/jul/29/business/la-fi-ag-overtime-20100729/2">Schwarzenegger vetoes overtime for farmworkers</a> (Los Angeles Times)</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>CA Supreme Court Says Google Age Discrimination Case Can Go to Trial</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/2010/08/ca-supreme-court-says-google-age-discrimination-case-can-go-to-trial.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com,2010://1661.20638</id>

    <published>2010-08-06T18:55:35Z</published>
    <updated>2010-08-06T20:15:56Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[The California Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that an age discrimination lawsuit brought against Google Inc. can proceed to trial.&nbsp;The lawsuit was brought against Google by Brian Reid, who was employed by the company from 2002 to 2004 until being...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Grady &amp; Associates</name>
        <uri>http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/mt-bin/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=1661&amp;id=2161</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Discrimination" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="brianreid" label="Brian Reid" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="google" label="Google" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="agediscrimination" label="age discrimination" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="strayremarks" label="stray remarks" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The California Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that an <a href="http://www.lawgrady.com/CustomPage.shtml">age discrimination</a> lawsuit brought against Google Inc. can proceed to trial.&nbsp;The lawsuit was brought against Google by Brian Reid, who was employed by the company from 2002 to 2004 until being terminated. Google had disputed whether there&nbsp;was enough potential&nbsp;evidence of age discrimination to justify the case&nbsp;going to trial. Particularly, the disagreement between both sides&nbsp;centered on whether "stray remarks" made by colleagues of Reid's&nbsp;were enough to show discrimination or bias on the part of the company toward him. </p>
<p>Previously, employers had used the "stray remarks" doctrine, set by a U.S. Supreme Court decision of 1989, to protect themselves from liability for a manager's offensive comments about an employee who is later demoted or fired. Google had sought to have the case dismissed, saying any evidence of discriminatory comments Reid had to bolster his case amounted to "stray remarks" made by employees who had no authority over his hiring or firing. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Employment law experts&nbsp;are saying that this ruling is a win for employees. A recent article in The Wall Street Journal <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703748904575411684212920068.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">says</a> that this ruling will make it easier for employees to get their case heard by a jury and will make it more difficult for employers to defeat discrimination claims early in the process. </p>
<p>Source:</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703748904575411684212920068.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">Google Is Set Back in Age-Bias Case In Ruling With Broad Implications</a> (The Wall Street Journal)</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>What&apos;s Next for the Americans With Disabilities Act? </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/2010/07/whats-next-for-the-americans-with-disabilities-act.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com,2010://1661.19541</id>

    <published>2010-07-29T19:49:10Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-29T20:19:20Z</updated>

    <summary>As we mentioned in our previous post, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) marked the 20th anniversary of its signing on Monday, July 26. When George H.W. Bush signed the law, he borrowed a line from President Ronald Reagan&apos;s speech...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Grady &amp; Associates</name>
        <uri>http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/mt-bin/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=1661&amp;id=2161</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Discrimination" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Employee Rights" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="ada" label="ADA" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="americanswithdisabilitiesact" label="Americans with Disabilities Act" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>As we mentioned in our previous post, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) marked the 20th anniversary of its signing on Monday, July 26. When George H.W. Bush signed the law, he borrowed a line from President Ronald Reagan's speech pertaining to the fall of the Berlin wall, proclaiming, "Let the shameful walls of exclusion finally come tumbling down." </p>
<p>The ADA was passed in order to make illegal discrimination toward a person because of a disability. The law mandated that employers provide their employees with "reasonable accommodations" to do their job in spite of their disability. The ADA also mandated greater accessibility for public and commercial structures and public transportation. </p>
<p>Now that it has been 20 years since the law passed, many Americans across the country have been wondering where the ADA will go from here.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>At an event to celebrate the anniversary Monday on the White House's South Lawn, President Obama signed an executive order to increase federal employment of individuals with disabilities. The Obama administration employs several people with disabilities. </p>
<p>Kareem Dale, who is legally blind, became President Obama's White House adviser on disability policy, the first person to hold the new position.&nbsp;Dale is interested in reevaluating the ADA and bringing it up-to-date with today's advances in technology, such as making Internet websites more universally accessible through such means as voice-recognition software.</p>
<p>The Justice Department is also looking into how it might update the ADA to fit more with today's technological advancements and opportunities. Among the opportunities they are looking into, include possibly mandating more accessible office equipment and furniture. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Sources:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2010/0726/ADA-at-20-breakthroughs-abound-but-some-attitudes-unchanged">ADA at 20: breakthroughs abound, but some attitudes unchanged</a>&nbsp;(The Christian Science Monitor)</p>
<p><a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/federal-eye/2010/07/americans_with_disabilities_ac.html">Americans with Disabilities Act marks 20 years</a>&nbsp;(The Washington Post)</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Americans with Disabilities Act Marks 20 Years This Week</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/2010/07/americans-with-disabilities-act-marks-20-years-this-week.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com,2010://1661.19518</id>

    <published>2010-07-29T18:17:19Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-29T20:09:33Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[It was 20 years ago Monday that President George H.W. Bush signed the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)&nbsp;into law. The law's goal was to break down barriers facing people with disabilities in society and the workplace. The ADA is a...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Grady &amp; Associates</name>
        <uri>http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/mt-bin/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=1661&amp;id=2161</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Discrimination" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Employee Rights" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="ada" label="ADA" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="americanswithdisabilitiesact" label="Americans with Disabilities Act" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>It was 20 years ago Monday that President George H.W. Bush signed the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)&nbsp;into law. The law's goal was to break down barriers facing people with disabilities in society and the workplace. The ADA is a broad law that is meant to protect the civil rights of people with disabilities and to prevent them from being <a href="http://www.lawgrady.com/CustomPage.shtml">discriminated</a> against, much like the Civil Rights Act of 1964 outlawed discrimination based on religion, race, sex, national origin, and other factors.</p>
<p>As the anniversary was acknowledged around the country, there was much discussion as to how far the country has come since the passage of the law and how much further there still is to go to level the playing field for people with disabilities. While most agree that the United States has made great strides since the ADA passed in making public and commercial structures, public transportation, and workplaces more accessible, many feel there is still a long way to go. </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Some experts in the field, according to&nbsp;a piece by&nbsp;The Christian Science Monitor, feel that the biggest barrier to break down is attitudinal. Many Americans still don't realize that people with disabilities are extremely productive members of society. In addition, people with disabilities tend to do best and keep their jobs in workplaces where their employer cares about creating a culture sensitive and supportive to their needs, as opposed to a workplace where the employer may try to sneak around the law.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Sources:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2010/0726/ADA-at-20-breakthroughs-abound-but-some-attitudes-unchanged">ADA at 20: breakthroughs abound, but some attitudes unchanged</a>&nbsp;(The Christian Science Monitor)</p>
<p><a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/federal-eye/2010/07/americans_with_disabilities_ac.html">Americans with Disabilities Act marks 20 years</a>&nbsp;(The Washington Post)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Vilsack, White House Admit Sherrod Was Unfairly Fired</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/2010/07/vilsack-white-house-admit-sherrod-was-wrongfully-terminated.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com,2010://1661.18825</id>

    <published>2010-07-22T21:36:41Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-26T17:48:02Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[Agriculture SecretaryTom Vilsack has admitted that&nbsp;USDA worker&nbsp;Shirley Sherrod was&nbsp;unfairly fired when he&nbsp;made a hasty decision based on inaccurate and misleading facts.&nbsp;Sherrod, the USDA Georgia State Rural Development Director, was featured&nbsp;on conservative blogger Andrew Breitbart's&nbsp;site in an edited video in which...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Grady &amp; Associates</name>
        <uri>http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/mt-bin/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=1661&amp;id=2161</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Discrimination" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Wrongful Termination" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="shirleysherrod" label="Shirley Sherrod" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="tomvilsack" label="Tom Vilsack" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="discrimination" label="discrimination" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="forcedresignation" label="forced resignation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Agriculture SecretaryTom Vilsack has admitted that&nbsp;USDA worker&nbsp;Shirley Sherrod was&nbsp;unfairly fired when he&nbsp;made a hasty decision based on inaccurate and misleading facts.&nbsp;Sherrod, the USDA Georgia State Rural Development Director, was featured&nbsp;on conservative blogger Andrew Breitbart's&nbsp;site in an edited video in which she spoke about not putting her full effort into helping out a white farmer in need. Breitbart was using the video to say that the USDA has perpetuated racial discrimination. </p>
<p>The media picked up on the story and Vilsack&nbsp;ordered Sherrod's resignation. He&nbsp;says that he alone was reponsible for Sherrod's forced resignation, but the White House agreed with the decision.&nbsp;Later, the story came out that the comments were taken out of context and the video highly edited. Vilsack and White House press secretary Robert Gibbs have since apologized to Sherrod for her firing, acknowledging her&nbsp;record of good work for the USDA and her committment to&nbsp;civil rights for all people.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>In the video clip, Sherrod is heard saying in a speech that she didn't&nbsp;do all she could to&nbsp;help a white farmer. In the unedited, real&nbsp;version of the speech, however,&nbsp;Sherrod speaks about how she ultimately learned through working with that white farmer and his family that it was important&nbsp;to work for individuals struggling no matter their race. </p>
<p>The speech was given when she was working in her federal position for the USDA, but she was speaking of an event that happened while in a state government position 24 years ago. The farmers she was talking about in the speech publicly defended Sherrod this week, telling members of the media that Sherrod had helped them to save their farm.</p>
<p>Sherrod accepted Vilsack and Gibbs' apologies and said they could move forward. Vilsack has also offered Sherrod a new job within the USDA, but Sherrod is not sure yet if she will accept the offer. </p>
<p>Source:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/07/21/agriculture.employee.usda/index.html">Vilsack, White House apologize to former USDA official</a> (CNN)</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Employees File Race Discrimination Lawsuit Against Edison</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/2010/07/employees-file-race-discrimination-lawsuit-against-edison.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com,2010://1661.18722</id>

    <published>2010-07-21T19:52:24Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-21T20:15:21Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[The Contra Costa Times reports that current and former employees of Southern California Edison filed a race discrimination&nbsp;lawsuit&nbsp;Tuesday against the company&nbsp;in Los Angeles Superior Court. The eleven current and former black employees accuse the company of perpetuating a negative work...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Grady &amp; Associates</name>
        <uri>http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/mt-bin/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=1661&amp;id=2161</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Discrimination" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="edison" label="Edison" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="classactionlawsuit" label="class-action lawsuit" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="racediscrimination" label="race discrimination" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The Contra Costa Times reports that current and former employees of Southern California Edison filed a <a href="http://www.lawgrady.com/CustomPage.shtml">race discrimination</a>&nbsp;lawsuit&nbsp;Tuesday against the company&nbsp;in Los Angeles Superior Court. The eleven current and former black employees accuse the company of perpetuating a negative work environment that is racially hostile. </p>
<p>The employees filed the lawsuit&nbsp;with class-action status. They say that the company has engaged in a pattern of racial discrimination and say there are few black senior managers in the company. They also&nbsp;accuse the company of racial discrimination in regards to pay and job assignments,&nbsp;claiming unequal pay and unequal access to&nbsp;advancement. &nbsp;</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>This is not the first such lawsuit to be filed against the giant utility company. Class-action lawsuits alleging racial discrimination were brought against Edison in 1974 and 1994. The lawsuit&nbsp;argues that the company has failed to comply with a consent decree that resulted from the 1994 lawsuit, in which the company agreed to pay $11.3 million into a settlement fund. They also agreed to start training and leadership programs. </p>
<p>An attorney for the employees says that some of his clients were involved in the 1994 lawsuit and that the company has continued its negative culture despite the lawsuits and that his clients are still treated like "second-class citizens" at the company. In addition to damages and attorney fees, the lawsuit seeks an injunction against the&nbsp;company to force it to fully comply with the consent decree. </p>
<p>Source:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.contracostatimes.com/california/ci_15563313">Edison hit by lawsuit</a> (Contra Costa Times)</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Laid-Off CA Workers Sue Toyota, Factory, Claim Unfair Severance</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/2010/07/laid-off-ca-workers-sue-toyota-factory-claim-unfair-severance.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com,2010://1661.18199</id>

    <published>2010-07-16T16:09:35Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-21T10:34:04Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[According to The Associated Press, former employees of the closed Nummi auto plant&nbsp;filed a lawsuit against&nbsp;the factory and Toyota on Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Oakland, California. The employees say the&nbsp;Fremont-based company discriminated against them because they were on...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Grady &amp; Associates</name>
        <uri>http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/mt-bin/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=1661&amp;id=2161</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Discrimination" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="nummi" label="Nummi" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="toyota" label="Toyota" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="disability" label="disability" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="discrimination" label="discrimination" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="laidoffworkers" label="laid-off workers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="severancepackage" label="severance package" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>According to The Associated Press, former employees of the closed Nummi auto plant&nbsp;filed a lawsuit against&nbsp;the factory and Toyota on Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Oakland, California. The employees say the&nbsp;Fremont-based company <a href="http://www.lawgrady.com/CustomPage.shtml">discriminated</a> against them because they were on disability at the time of the factory's closure and, for that reason, were compensated less in their severance packages. </p>
<p>The lawsuit seeks a revised severance agreement, restitution, lost compensation, other employee benefits and monetary damages. The lawsuit seeks class-action status. Attorneys representing the plaintiffs believe that of the 4,700 workers who lost their jobs when the factory closed, 300 of them could be considered plaintiffs.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>The New United Motor Manufacturing Inc., or Nummi, plant opened in 1984 as a joint venture between General Motors Co. and Toyota. Last year, GM left after filing for bankruptcy protection. Without GM, Toyota had to shut the plant on April 1. </p>
<p>According to The Associated Press, many of the employees who were laid-off&nbsp;received a union-negotiated payout of at least $21,175 each. Employees who worked continuously in the six months before the plant closed received enhancements on that payment, a figure a lawyer for the plaintiffs says averages out to about and additional&nbsp;$32,000. </p>
<p>Attorneys representing the employees say that some of their clients had worked for the factory for 25 years and were injured in the six months before the factory closed down. They say their clients' lower severance packages due to their disabilities amounts to discrimination.</p>

<p>Source:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hc5dTfzTEVLaCSqqVuPZPQDIau9gD9GV4OC80">Former workers at Calif. plant sue Toyota, factory</a>&nbsp;(The Associated Press)</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>24 Hour Fitness Sued by Employees for Discrimination</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/2010/07/24-hour-fitness-sued-by-employees-for-discrimination.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com,2010://1661.17964</id>

    <published>2010-07-14T18:59:33Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-14T20:10:01Z</updated>

    <summary>According to the San Francisco Business Times, employees of the gym chain 24 Hour Fitness have filed a class-action lawsuit in Alameda County Superior Court alleging race and gender discrimination on the part of their employer. The employees allege that...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Grady &amp; Associates</name>
        <uri>http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/mt-bin/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=1661&amp;id=2161</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Discrimination" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="24hourfitness" label="24 Hour Fitness" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="california" label="California" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="classactionlawsuit" label="class-action lawsuit" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="genderdiscrimination" label="gender discrimination" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="racediscrimination" label="race discrimination" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.sandiegoemploymentlawattorney.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>According to the San Francisco Business Times, employees of the gym chain 24 Hour Fitness have filed a class-action lawsuit in Alameda County Superior Court alleging <a href="http://www.lawgrady.com/CustomPage.shtml">race and gender discrimination</a> on the part of their employer. The employees allege that the San&nbsp;Ramon-based&nbsp;company's employment practices systematically discriminated against female and minority employees, resulting in lower pay and the denial of promotions for female and minority&nbsp;employees. They accuse their employer of&nbsp;violating California's Fair Employment and Housing Act and the California Business and Profession Code.</p>
<p>The employees who brought the lawsuit claim they received unequal pay and were passed up for promotions to management positions. The lawsuit asks the court to order 24 Hour Fitness to end their allegedly discriminatory hiring and promotions practices. The employees are also asking the court to order their employer to pay damages and back pay to correct the allegedly unequal compensation and unfair treatment.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>24 Hour Fitness employs 20,500 people&nbsp;and has revenues of around $1.25 billion.&nbsp;It is the country's largest gym chain. Its 420 clubs&nbsp;across 17 states&nbsp;have a combined total of around&nbsp;4 million members. </p>
<p>The gym chain says that it complies with all employment laws. The&nbsp;company says it is&nbsp;an Equal Employment Opportunity Employer&nbsp;committed to creating a workplace free of discrimination and retaliation. The employer believes that when the facts come out, it will be shown that 24 Hour Fitness does not discriminate against its employees.</p>

<p>Source:</p>
<p><a href="http://sanfrancisco.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/stories/2010/07/12/daily20.html">24 Hour Fitness sued for race, gender bias</a>&nbsp;(San Francisco Business Times)</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>